🔗 Share this article

Ken Burns is now considered not just a historical storyteller; he is a brand, an unparalleled production entity. With each new documentary series heading for the PBS network, everybody wants his attention.

The filmmaker completed “an astonishing number of podcasts”, he notes, nearing the end of his extensive publicity circuit comprising four dozen cities, 80 screenings and innumerable conversations. “There seems to be a podcast for every citizen, and I believe I’ve appeared on most of them.”

Happily Burns possesses boundless energy, as loquacious behind the mic as he is productive during post-production. The veteran director has traveled from Monticello to popular podcasts to talk about a career-defining series: this historical epic, a monumental six-part, 12-hour documentary series that dominated a substantial portion of his recent years and arrived this week on public television.

Defiantly Traditional Approach

Like slow cooking in an age of fast food, The American Revolution is defiantly traditional, more redolent of historical documentary classics rather than contemporary streaming docs new media formats.

For the documentarian, who has built a career chronicling strands of US history including baseball, country music, jazz and national parks, the nation’s founding is not just another subject but fundamental. “I said this to my co-director Sarah Botstein the other day, and she agreed: we won’t work on a more important film Burns reflects from his New York base.

Extensive Historical Investigation

Burns and his collaborators along with writer Geoffrey Ward referenced thousands of books and other historical materials. Dozens of historians, spanning age and perspective, offered expert analysis along with leading scholars from a range of other fields including slavery, indigenous peoples’ narratives and imperial studies.

Characteristic Narrative Method

The style of the series will appear similar to fans of historical documentaries. The characteristic technique featured slow pans and zooms through archival photographs, extensive employment of contemporary scores featuring talent voicing historical documents.

Those projects established Burns established his reputation; years later, now the doyen of documentaries, he can apparently summon virtually any performer. Participating with Burns at a New York gathering, acclaimed writer Lin-Manuel Miranda commented: “When Ken Burns calls, you say ‘Yes.’”

All-Star Cast

The lengthy creation process provided advantages concerning availability. Sessions happened at professional facilities, at historical sites and remotely via Zoom, an approach adopted during the pandemic. Burns explains working with Josh Brolin, who scheduled a brief window during his travels to perform his role as the revolutionary leader prior to departing to his next engagement.

Additional performers feature numerous acclaimed actors, established Hollywood talent, Domhnall Gleeson, Amanda Gorman, Jonathan Groff, household names and rising talent, accomplished dramatic artists, British and American talent, Edward Norton, David Oyelowo, Mandy Patinkin, television and film stars, Dan Stevens, Meryl Streep.

Burns adds: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast gathered for any production. They do an extraordinary service. Selection wasn’t based on fame. I became frustrated when someone asked, ‘So why the celebrities?’. I go, ‘These are actors.’ They’re the finest actors in the world and they can bring this stuff alive.”

Multifaceted Story

Still, the absence of living witnesses, photography and newsreels required the filmmakers to depend substantially on historical documents, combining personal accounts of multiple revolutionary participants. This allowed them to introduce audiences not just the famous founders of that era but also to “dozens of others crucial to understanding, many of whom remain visually unknown.

Burns also indulged his personal passion for territorial understanding. “Maps fascinate me,” he comments, “and there are more maps throughout this series versus earlier productions I’ve done combined.”

International Impact

The production crew recorded at numerous significant sites across North America and British sites to capture the landscape’s character and worked extensively with re-enactors. These components unite to depict events more bloody, multifaceted and world-changing versus conventional understanding.

The revolution, it contends, was no mere parochial quarrel about property, revenue and governance. Rather, the series depicts a brutal conflict that eventually involved numerous countries and surprisingly represented what it calls “humanity’s highest ideals”.

Civil War Reality

Initial complaints and protests leveled at London by far-flung British subjects throughout multiple disputatious regions soon descended into a brutal civil conflict, setting brother against brother and creating local enmities. In episode two, the historian Alan Taylor observes: “The greatest misconception concerning independence struggle centers on assuming it constituted a unifying experience for colonists. This ignores the truth that colonists battled fellow colonists.”

Sophisticated Interpretation

According to his perspective, the revolution is a story that “typically is drowning in sentimentality and wistful remembrance and remains shallow and doesn’t have the respect for what actually took place, and all the participants and the widespread bloodshed.”

Taylor maintains, a revolution that proclaimed the world-changing idea of fundamental personal liberties; a bloody domestic struggle, pitting Patriots against Loyalists; and a worldwide engagement, continuing previous patterns of conflicts between Britain, France and Spain for the “prize of North America”.

Contingent Historical Events

The filmmaker also sought {to rediscover the